So, this is something I've been thinking about for a little while, and I'm curious. In a youngish fandom, where the selection of authors and stories (at least on LJ--I don't really do ff.net) is rather small, how critically do you read?
There is some fantastic work out there for this fandom. (For a few examples, here's my list of spring recs from a few weeks back.)
There is some crap.
But there's a whole hell of a lot in between.
There are good stories written with mediocre style or convoluted sentence structure. There are clever stories, well written, that clearly ignore canonical fact (we have birthdays and or death days for almost every character--CHECK THEM, people).
In the HP fandom I used to frequent, I was a very picky reader, only reading and commenting on stories that were smart, interesting, and well-executed. Here, I've tried to do the same, but I think I may be missing out on a lot of the good that's out there.
So, here's my question to you: What are your standards in this particular fandom? What sins do to ignore? What makes you hit the back button?
Go.
There is some fantastic work out there for this fandom. (For a few examples, here's my list of spring recs from a few weeks back.)
There is some crap.
But there's a whole hell of a lot in between.
There are good stories written with mediocre style or convoluted sentence structure. There are clever stories, well written, that clearly ignore canonical fact (we have birthdays and or death days for almost every character--CHECK THEM, people).
In the HP fandom I used to frequent, I was a very picky reader, only reading and commenting on stories that were smart, interesting, and well-executed. Here, I've tried to do the same, but I think I may be missing out on a lot of the good that's out there.
So, here's my question to you: What are your standards in this particular fandom? What sins do to ignore? What makes you hit the back button?
Go.